Monday, May 30, 2011

Happy Memorial Day! Honoring those in my family who served

Today I want to thank the men and women who have given large parts of their lives, and even made the ultimate sacrifice for our country to be free. God bless you all.
Every day I am reminded that no matter what is going on in the world, these tireless protectors are always vigilant. I live near Buckley Air Force base, and every day I hear the sounds of jet fighters running practice and training flights, always staying ready to defend and protect. I then remember the days after 9-11 when the skies were eerily silent, except for the sounds of those jets screaming over our heads, reminding us that our liberty was intact because, though we had been wounded by cowardly attack, we were aroused to discover our strength again.
Division E, U.S.S. Hassayampa, circa 1962

Finally, I want to thank my family members who have served in the military over the years of my life. My Dad, Jesse L. Stewart, served as communications officer on several ships and destroyers during the rise of the tensions of the Cold War. He served aboard the U.S.S. Hassayampa during Operation Dominic, Joint Task Force Eight, known to all of us as the 1962 Nuclear Tests. They did twenty-four full tests in four months, and laid the ground work for the security and strength of the United States of America for the next several decades, and continuing on to today. Here is a picture of Division E on the Hassayampa, that's my Dad in the upper right corner. Here is the close up:

My brother served as a Hospital Corpsman, (pronounced Core-Man, Mr. President!) in the Navy and achieved the rank of Chief Petty Officer. 

He retired just last year after way too many years in the military. (Just kidding). He was the only doc on many ships on long voyages all over the globe.  I owe him an eternal debt for his service and am so proud to be his brother. He is a proven patriot. 
There are more in my family who served and I honor their sacrifice and service as well, but today I acknowledge the great service of my Dad, Jesse L. Stewart, and Steven Wade Stewart, my brother, who are just normal guys now, just working for a living and leaving the serving and protecting to the younger ones. Gentlemen, God bless you for your service. It's an honor to know such fine men!

Sunday, May 29, 2011

Above the Law

George Will writes in the Washington Post about Obama's choice to ignore the War Powers Act, which requires that a President terminate military action within 60 days, if Congress has not approved it. The war against Libya began more than 70 days ago. However, Obama has the full support of one John McCain, as Will points out in this final paragraph:
“No president,” says Sen. John McCain, “has ever recognized the constitutionality of the War Powers Act, and neither do I. So I don’t feel bound by any deadline.” Oh? No law is actually a law if presidents and senators do not “recognize” it? Now, there is an interesting alternative to judicial review, and an indicator of how executive aggrandizement and legislative dereliction of duty degrade the rule of law.

Wednesday, May 25, 2011

The Potion

Now that school is out for the summer, parents need to be vigilant in protecting their children from all manner of potential mishaps. Or, as in my case, you need to encourage your kids to practice good preventive health. This morning Jon and Greg decided to go outside and collect items for a health potion. If anyone is injured, they just need to drink from this magic potion. Here are the ingredients:
Rum
Snake eye goop
wild mushrooms
Leprechan blood
Zandernach (a dragon monster) blood
goblin piss
black powder
evil flowers that bite
dried Rhinosasaurus tears (a creature with three tails)
the brain of a thing only Jon and Greg know how to spell and pronounce
Armadillo milk
Fire Ant (this is the most important ingredient)

Cook for fifty minutes on high
Mush everything up as you cook
Freeze until ice forms
Thaw it out
Freeze it again
Thaw it out
Pour it in an old aspirin container
Try to get your little sister to drink it.
Run when your father intervenes.

Let's go back to pre-1959 borders!

I just heard a funny thought (by listening to Mike Rosen's talk radio show). Someone wrote to the White House Facebook page, and suggested that the United States go back to pre-1959 borders, before Hawaii became a state. That way Barack Obama would no longer be President.

Sunday, May 22, 2011

Searching For True Significance #4 - We seek achievement through our children or others



We seek achievement through our children or others


And if all of these previous things seem to have passed us by, we can put the responsibility of our significance onto someone else in our lives, whether a spouse or a son or daughter, small group of people or those we work with or that work for us. I always get the picture of the parent yelling at the kid when they are not playing well at the little league game or soccer tournament. "Eyes on the ball, Danny, dog gone it! That kid, I swear." This is followed by silence in the car on the way home and an hour of throwing strikes or free throws before dinner. This is a destructive pattern that is all too common in our competitive society where there is no place for losers. First place or no place. Nobody ever remembers the second place runner up, they say. The worst place I have ever seen this kind of behavior was not at the ball field or concert hall, or a business, but in church. Kids told that they are the next "Apostle So-and-So with a call to reach the Nations" without being given the tools and training and nurture necessary to really fill those kind of shoes. It's hard enough to be a teenager or young person these days, much less to be responsible for the whole world. Even if they are the next great generation, they need to see it before they can be it. Parents and elders are responsible to model greatness, and not just push it upon young people without a commitment to help them when it gets hard. Placing the responsibility for our personal significance and worth on others is a destructive habit if not done right. However, when a true vision is presented and made available, and healthy mentoring and modeling are present, then this is not abuse, it is passing on a multi-generational legacy, which is something so rare in these days of extreme fatherlessness as to be almost apocryphal. 


From: JavaJazzJesus

Mitch Daniels Will Not Seek GOP Nomination



Washington –  Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels has informed supporters he will not seek the Republican White House nomination.
In an email first mailed to the Indianapolis Star and obtained by Fox News, Daniels said that he is caught between conflicting duties: family and country.
"The answer is that I will not be a candidate. What could have been a complicated decision was in the end very simple: on matters affecting us all, our family constitution gives a veto to the women's caucus, and there is no override provision," he said.
In a companion note to supporters, he added that he is "deeply concerned, for the first time in my life, about the future of our Republic" but that he is family was the most important factor in his decision to opt out of a run.

From: Fox News

Thursday, May 19, 2011

Searching For True Significance #3 - Seeking out love and experiences



We seek to love and be loved

As we grow older our attentions turn to the possibilities of reaching some fulfillment in relationships with others, in friendship, marriage or dating relationships. This is by far one of the most rewarding and worthy things to pursue in a life lived well. Much has been said and written about the importance of a strong family and the benefits it accrues to the individual and society. Looking at the lives of great men and women of history confirms that those that have a solid, affectionate and nurturing family ultimately become the great leaders of society and the world.
     But not all of us had such an atmosphere to grow up in. Most of us, truth be told, were in a less than perfect family. Even this desire of one member of a family to have an ideal family has been the ruin of a family. Think of the families where the appearance of this ideal for the public has become more important than the actual people in the family. We have all heard of the senator or business leader whose family was out of control and even violent in private. And while most of us don't experience this level of dysfunction, we would probably all agree that this is an area of great pain for many people.
     Then we seek fulfillment through another in relationship. The volumes that are printed on a daily basis about all of the various relationships between actors, singers and 'reality tv' stars are a testament to the importance attached to this in our day. Why else would a person buy a copy of multiple gossip magazines every month? And of course the answer is to feel better about themselves. They look at the Hollywood couples and say either, "Man, my life is great compared to this mess," or they dream of their perfect royal wedding to Prince Perfect. And so while they are fantasizing and comparing they are also desiring something better and higher for themselves.
     This desire to be loved and to love finds it's  most common attempt to be fulfilled in the riches and ditches of romantic relationship and marriage. From the beauty of the Biblical narrative in the Song of Solomon to Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet to Titanic we have made much of the ideal of love and romance in our Western culture, and rightly so it seems. For even the most tawdry and illicit relationship has at least one moment of bliss and excitement that points to something greater still. Something that seems to say, "Keep seeking."    
      

We seek experiences of all kinds – physical, mystical, emotional

For many the search for meaning and significance leads to a kind of eclecticism of experience. Thrill seekers, chill seekers, and adrenaline junkies of all types go for the style of life best described in our day as the Just Do It mindset. Some go into the mystical and spiritual areas of life and develop deep, spiritual lives, seeking the highest and the best humanity can achieve. Others  develop their experience orientation around health and fitness, or sports. Of course, there are the extremes of the extremes that lead to destructive lifestyles and even sickness and death. Stories of drug addiction and sexual exploits gone wrong and leading to the ditch of disease and debauchery, and the exploitation of young people in cults are all too common stories we know of in our own lives or someone we know. Experience is valuable, but in itself is no answer to the true call of the wild in our souls.

from: JavaJazzJesus

Kingdom Quotes: Oswald Chambers on Trusting God In Times of Trouble


"OUT OF THE WRECK I RISE"
"Who shall separate us from the love of Christ?" Romans 8:35
God does not keep a man immune from trouble; He says - "I will be with him in trouble." It does not matter what actual troubles in the most extreme form get hold of a man's life, not one of them can separate him from his relationship to God. We are "more than conquerors in all these things." Paul is not talking of imaginary things, but of things that are desperately actual; and he says we are super-victors in the midst of them, not by our ingenuity, or by our courage, or by anything other than the fact that not one of them affects our relationship to God in Jesus Christ. Rightly or wrongly, we are where we are, exactly in the condition we are in. I am sorry for the Christian who has not something in his circumstances he wishes was not there.
"Shall tribulation . . . ?" Tribulation is never a noble thing; but let tribulation be what it may - exhausting, galling, fatiguing, it is not able to separate us from the love of God. Never let cares or tribulations separate you from the fact that God loves you.
"Shall anguish . . . ?" - can God's love hold when everything says that His love is a lie, and that there is no such thing as justice?
"Shall famine . . . ?" - can we not only believe in the love of God but be more than conquerors, even while we are being starved?
Either Jesus Christ is a deceiver and Paul is deluded, or some extraordinary thing happens to a man who holds on to the love of God when the odds are all against God's character. Logic is silenced in the face of every one of these things. Only one thing can account for it - the love of God in Christ Jesus. "Out of the wreck I rise" every time.

Kingdom Quotes -Spurgeon on Speaking God's Word



“Thou shalt be as my mouth.”

What an honor! Should not every preacher, yea, every believer, covet it? For God to speak by us, what a marvel! We shall speak sure, pure truth; and we shall speak it with power. Our word shall not return void; it shall be a blessing to those who receive it, and those who refuse it shall do so at their peril. Our lips shall feed many. We shall arouse the sleeping and call the dead to life.

O dear reader, pray that it may be so with all the sent servants of our LORD.

Floods on the Mississippi bring devastation while people try to cope


Check out these stunning photos of the devastation and flooding on the Mississippi at the Atlantic.

Waive Me! - Most Waivers For ObamaCare From Pelosi's District - Michelle Malkin

Hear that? It’s the escalating cry of American employers and workers trying to hold on to their health care benefits in the age of stifling Obama health insurance mandates: Gangway! Gangway! Save me! Waive me!
Obamacare refugees first began beating down the exit doors in October 2010. As I’ve documented since last fall, waiver-mania started with McDonald’s and Jack in the Box; spread to Dish Networks, hair salon chain Regis Corp and resort giant Universal Orlando; took hold among every major Big Labor organization from the AFL-CIO to the CWA to the SEIU; roped in the nationalized health care promoters at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (whose board of trustees includes health care czar Nancy Ann DeParle); and is now gripping entire states (Maine, New Hampshire and Nevada all recently got in on the act).
The latest to catch the waive? West Coast liberals.
Yes, smack dab in the middle of House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi’s congressional district, a cluster of San Francisco small businesses is among the latest recipients of get-out-of-Obamacare passes. As Jamie Dupree of Cox Media Group and Matthew Boyle of The Daily Caller pointed out this week, there are at least two dozen Bay Area companies — including bars, restaurants, hotels, tourist shops, real estate and auto firms — that have secured temporary, one-year reprieves from the federal law. It’s the San Francisco Treat that voters didn’t foresee until after the bill was rammed down their throats.
Another noteworthy waiver winner: Seattle-based REI. The trendy Pacific Northwest outdoor equipment retailer’s progressive CEO and Democratic campaign donor, Sally Jewell, appeared with President Obama in 2009 to tout White House health care reform initiatives. Two years later, REI snagged a waiver to protect the health benefits of a whopping 1,180 workers from the very tentacles of the big government bureaucrats Jewell embraced at Obama’s roundtable.
To date, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has granted federal health care law exemptions to more than three million American workers covered by more than 1,300 unions, companies and insurers who had voluntarily offered low-cost health plans with annual benefits limits. Meddling Obamacare architects outlawed those private plans — nicknamed “mini med” plans — in the name of “patients’ rights.” But without special waivers, the escapees would have been forced to hike premiums or drop insurance coverage altogether for mostly low-wage, seasonal and part-time workers.
Among the most recent union affiliates to secure pardons from the one-size-fits-all health policy that their bosses spent hundreds of millions of dollars of worker dues lobbying for:
– Teamsters Local 485 Health and Welfare Fund in Brooklyn, N.Y.
-_- Detroit and Vicinity Trowel Trades Health and Welfare Fund_
– Communications Workers of America (CWA) Local 1182 Security Benefits Fund_
– CWA Local 1183 Health and Welfare Fund
-_- Bakers Union and Food Employees Labor Relations Association Health and Welfare Fund
_– Service Employees International Union Healthcare Illinois Home Care and Child Care Fund_
– United Food and Commercial Workers San Diego Employers Health and Welfare Trust_
– Welfare Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineers Local 15, 15A, 15C, 15D AFL-CIO
-_- United Steelworkers Local 1-0318 Health and Welfare Trust Fund_
– United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices Local 198 AFL-CIO Health and Welfare Trust
_– Teamsters Local 617 Welfare Fund in Ridgefield, N.J.
– Teamsters Local 734 Welfare Fund in Chicago
– Plumbers and Steamfitters Local 60 Health and Welfare Fund
– New York State Nurses Welfare Plan for New York City Employed Registered Professional Nurses
The ultimate goal, it bears repeating, is to force a massive, revolutionary and irreversible shift from private to public insurance designed by government-knows-best bureaucrats.
Pelosi and the Golden Ticket Administrators in Washington deny preferential treatment for waiver beneficiaries. But the stench of waivers-for-favors won’t be dispelled until and unless the Obama administration releases a full list not only of those who won exemptions, but also of those who applied and were denied.
With San Francisco businesses caught with their hands in the waiver jar, Pelosi’s office could do nothing else but pout: “It is pathetic,” said Pelosi spokesman Drew Hammill, “that there are those who would be cheering for Americans to lose their minimum health coverage or see their premiums increase for political purposes.”
It is far more pathetic to have cheered, as Pelosi did on the one-year anniversary of Obamacare, the law’s onerous benefits limits from which thousands of her own constituents have now been exempted.
Once again, the rest of America wants to know: Dude, where’s my waiver?
from: MichelleMalkin.com

New 2012 buzz: Rick Perry thinking of jumping in? - via HotAir.com



After months of gassy media speculation about Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, and Chris Christie, we’re all near the point of dismissing deus-ex-machina rumors about candidates out of hand.

But this one … doesn’t seem so far-fetched.

A Texas pol who is close to Perry has been telling a few key strategists that the nation’s longest-serving governor sees a vacuum and is waiting to be summoned into the race. This source believes that could happen by late summer. Without fellow Southerners Haley Barbour or Mike Huckabee in the race — and with Newt Gingrich’s early troubles raising further doubts about the current lineup — there could be a glaring niche for Perry to fill.


According to another well-connected Republican, at least one Perry confidant has been very quietly making inquiries about the political terrain in the nation’s first voting state of Iowa. A third Perry associate, RCP has learned, has been heralding a small contingent of Iowans with the time-tested line that is often used by would-be candidates who are leaving their options open: “Keep your powder dry.”


Perry’s aides have long made it clear that the tough-talking Texan, who succeeded George W. Bush in Austin in 2000, would not seriously entertain the idea of mounting a White House run before the state’s legislative session finishes at the end of this month. That date is now less than two weeks away, and the 2012 presidential field remains fluid…


Perry’s presidential prospects may ultimately be contingent on the decision made by the only GOP White House hopeful who can boast a resume and home state that is large enough to mess with Texas: former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin. Perry shares Palin’s dexterity with the simple, tough-talking language that tends to fire up the tea party faithful and is similarly adept at connecting on a human level that comes across as decidedly anti-politician, despite his more than a decade in the governor’s mansion.





His aides strenuously deny it, of course. Still, why not Perry? He has more than a decade of experience leading one of America’s biggest states, can boast economic growth at a moment when voters are desperate for relief from the malaise, would enjoy key regional support as a southerner, has budget-cutting cred to spare that’ll please tea partiers, and flashes enough personality to make him easily stand out at debates against other top-tier candidates like Romney, Pawlenty, and Daniels. If Michele Bachmann is confident enough of her chances in Iowa to run (“This is now beyond speculation. They are doing this.”), Perry might as well give it a go too. His concern, I guess, is that if Palin follows him into the race, she and Bachmann will siphon off enough votes on the right to make a lesser-known name like his unlikely to win any primaries. But to some extent that’s a self-fulfilling prophesy: The surest way for him and other grassroots favorites to discourage Palin from running is to jump in ASAP and start claiming votes (and political operatives in primary states) whom she’d need to boost her chances against the Romney/Pawlenty/Daniels centrists. That’s always been Bachmann’s strategy, I take it, that the surest way to avoid being stomped by Palin among tea partiers is to claim enough of her niche early that she decides to pass on the race. Perry would be even more formidable. But the longer he waits, the riskier it is.

Ed e-mails to say that he’s been expecting Perry to make a national move for a long time now and points to his unusual penchant, as a governor, for engaging on national issues. His candidacy does make a lot of sense. Tick tock.



from: Hotair

Cliff: Gotta love a guy who has more pics on the web holding a gun than pretty-boy close-ups!

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Cartoon: Our enemies will hear us soon!!

The Search for True Significance: Comparisons and Achievements


We look outward at others and compare ourselves to them

Next, of course, is the inevitable step of looking to external factors and to compare ourselves to others. You're tall, I'm not. You're different in a hundred ways to me. In children, of course, this is not usually a problem. Remember the stories of black and white children playing together happily in the playground of South Africa during apartheid. They had no idea they were so different until their parents informed them. Of course, our comparisons grow up as we do. They become more subtle, more damning, more condemning and secret.    


We seek for achievement to distinguish ourselves

And so, we seek to be known for something good, unique, powerful, so we can look good on our own comparison meter. It starts in the school yard, where we realize we are taller, or smarter, or gifted differently from the other kids. We appreciate ourselves because we are the ones who are good at math, or sports, or singing. And as the years go by the comparisons get more elaborate with spelling bees, science projects, sports team championship, and all of the other myriad ways we acknowledge achievement. Of course, a wall full of trophies from Jr. High don't guarantee a successful, fulfilling life, do they? One of the most humorous moments in the movie Napoleon Dynamite was the scene of Uncle Rico video taping himself throwing a football and fantasizing about going back in time to win state. It's funny, but in a pathetic way. And the reason it's funny is it is all too true of us all. We all relate to Rico and his sad fantasy. We want to be special, significant. We all desire to be champions or beauty queens of some kind, admired by adoring crowds. When this desire is turned into an adult desire for success many of us find a challenge worthy of our greatest attention. We exchange the trophies, awards and crowns for houses, cars and status. But within all of this is the very real desire to be significant. 

Bin Laden Mission Was One-Shot Deal


WASHINGTON -- Those who planned the secret mission to get Usama bin Laden in Pakistan knew it was a one-shot deal, and it nearly went terribly wrong.
The U.S. deliberately hid the operation from Pakistan, and predicted that national outrage over the breach of Pakistani sovereignty would make it impossible to try again if the raid on bin Laden's suspected redoubt came up dry.
Once the raiders reached their target, things started to go awry almost immediately, officials briefed on the operation said.
Adding exclusive new details to the account of the assault on bin Laden's hideout, officials described just how the SEAL raiders loudly ditched a foundering helicopter right outside bin Laden's door, ruining the plan for a surprise assault. That forced them to abandon plans to run a squeeze play on bin Laden -- simultaneously entering the house stealthily from the roof and the ground floor.
Instead, they busted into the ground floor and began a floor-by-floor storming of the house, working up to the top level where they had assumed bin Laden -- if he was in the house -- would be.
They were right.
The raiders came face-to-face with bin Laden in a hallway outside his bedroom, and three of the Americans stormed in after him, U.S. officials briefed on the operation told The Associated Press. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity to describe a classified operation.
U.S. officials believe Pakistani intelligence continues to support militants who attack U.S. troops in Afghanistan, and actively undermine U.S. intelligence operations to go after Al Qaeda inside Pakistan. The level of distrust is such that keeping Pakistan in the dark was a major factor in planning the raid, and led to using the high-tech but sometimes unpredictable helicopter technology that nearly unhinged the mission.
Pakistan's government has since condemned the action, and threatened to open fire if U.S. forces enter again.
On Monday, the two partners attempted to patch up relations, agreeing to pursue high-value targets jointly.
The decision to launch on that particular moonless night in May came largely because too many American officials had been briefed on the plan. U.S. officials feared if it leaked to the press, bin Laden would disappear for another decade.
U.S. special operations forces have made approximately four forays into Pakistani territory since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, though this one, some 90 miles inside Pakistan, was unlike any other, the officials say.
The job was given to a SEAL Team 6 unit, just back from Afghanistan, one official said. This elite branch of SEALs had been hunting bin Laden in eastern Afghanistan since 2001.
Five aircraft flew from Jalalabad, Afghanistan, with three school-bus-size Chinook helicopters landing in a deserted area roughly two-thirds of the way to bin Laden's compound in the Pakistani city of Abbottabad, two of the officials explained.
Aboard two Black Hawk helicopters were 23 SEALs, an interpreter and a tracking dog named Cairo. Nineteen SEALs would enter the compound, and three of them would find bin Laden, one official said, providing the exact numbers for the first time.
Aboard the Chinooks were two dozen more SEALs, as backup.
The Black Hawks were specially engineered to muffle the tail rotor and engine sound, two officials said. The added weight of the stealth technology meant cargo was calculated to the ounce, with weather factored in. The night of the mission, it was hotter than expected.
The Black Hawks were to drop the SEALs and depart in less than two minutes, in hopes locals would assume they were Pakistani aircraft visiting the nearby military academy.
One Black Hawk was to hover above the compound, with SEALs sliding down ropes into the open courtyard.
The second was to hover above the roof to drop SEALs there, then land more SEALs outside, plus an interpreter and the dog, who would track anyone who tried to escape and to alert SEALs to any approaching Pakistani security forces.
If troops appeared, the plan was to hunker down in the compound, avoiding armed confrontation with the Pakistanis while officials in Washington negotiated their passage out.
The two SEAL teams inside would work toward each other, in a simultaneous attack from above and below, their weapons silenced, guaranteeing surprise, one of the officials said. They would have stormed the building in a matter of minutes, as they'd done time and again in two training models of the compound.
The plan unraveled as the first helicopter tried to hover over the compound. The Black Hawk skittered around uncontrollably in the heat-thinned air, forcing the pilot to land. As he did, the tail and rotor got caught on one of the compound's 12-foot (3.6-meter) walls. The pilot quickly buried the aircraft's nose in the dirt to keep it from tipping over, and the SEALs clambered out into an outer courtyard.
The other aircraft did not even attempt hovering, landing its SEALs outside the compound.
Now, the raiders were outside, and they'd lost the element of surprise.
They had trained for this, and started blowing their way in with explosives, through walls and doors, working their way up the three-level house from the bottom.
They had to blow their way through barriers at each stair landing, firing back, as one of the men in the house fired at them.
They shot three men as well as one woman, whom U.S. officials have said lunged at the SEALs.
Small knots of children were on every level, including the balcony of bin Laden's room.
As three of the SEALs reached the top of the steps on the third floor, they saw bin Laden standing at the end of the hall. The Americans recognized him instantly, the officials said.
Bin Laden also saw them, dimly outlined in the dark house, and ducked into his room.
The three SEALs assumed he was going for a weapon, and one by one they rushed after him through the door, one official described.
Two women were in front of bin Laden -- yelling and trying to protect him, two officials said. The first SEAL grabbed the two women and shoved them away, fearing they might be wearing suicide bomb vests, they said.
The SEAL behind him opened fire at bin Laden, putting one bullet in his chest, and one in his head.
It was over in a matter of seconds.
Back at the White House Situation Room, word was relayed that bin Laden had been found, signaled by the code word "Geronimo." That was not bin Laden's code name, but rather a representation of the letter "G." Each step of the mission was labeled alphabetically, and "Geronimo" meant that the raiders had reached step "G," the killing or capture of bin Laden, two officials said.
As the SEALs began photographing the body for identification, the raiders found an AK-47 rifle and a Russian-made Makarov pistol on a shelf by the door they'd just run through. Bin Laden hadn't touched them.
They were among a handful of weapons that were removed to be inventoried.
It took approximately 15 minutes to reach bin Laden, one official said. The next 23 or so were spent blowing up the broken chopper, after rounding up nine women and 18 children, to get them out of range of the blast.
One of the waiting Chinooks flew in to pick up bin Laden's body, the raiders from the broken aircraft and the weapons, documents and other materials seized at the site.
The helicopters flew back to Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan, and the body was flown to a waiting U.S. Navy ship for bin Laden's burial at sea, ensuring no shrine would spring up around his grave.
When the SEAL team met President Obama, he did not ask who shot bin Laden. He simply thanked each member of the team, two officials said.
In a few weeks, the team that killed bin Laden will go back to training, and in a couple of months, back to work overseas.


Sunday, May 15, 2011

What? " It's time to grow up?" Oh, no!

Kathleen Flake wrote an article first published one month ago in The Monterey Herald, and it is now in the Denver Post and "Special to the Washington Post." It is about the fact that Trey Parker's and Matt Stone's musical comedy The Book of Mormon is a smash hit on Broadway and two of George Will's short list of viable Republican Presidential candidates are Mormons. Flake's conclusion is that "Latter-day Saints have proven good neighbors, citizens and politicians. It's time to admit them to that well-populated club of people whose religion is not our own and even seems fantastical (virgin birth, predestination or infant damnation anyone?), but who are deemed perfectly acceptable presidential candidates.

Or, as Parker and Stone are saying, it's time to grow up."


Read the whole thing here.

Searching For True Significance #1- We look up and ask questions



Search For True Significance



We look up and ask questions – it’s in our nature

    Ever since man first looked up in wonder at the skies we have been curious. It seems to be almost a required attribute of the creature called human. After enough years we begin to seek more sophisticated and satisfying answers to these longings. We seek those closest to us, our elders, parents, teachers, and pepper them with the whys and hows of our existence. As soon as a child is able to speak this desire to have understanding is evident. In the lyrics to the Bobby Timmons jazz piece "Dat Dere" the child is continually asking wonderfully absurd questions:

"Hey mama, what's that there?
And what's that doing there?
Hey mama, up here! Mama, hey look at that over there!
And what's that doing there?
And where're they going there?
And mummy can I have that big elephant over there?"

    It seems this childish curiosity gets it's answers, but this only leads to the inevitable next question. The looks of befuddled, bedraggled parents all over the globe attest to the power of this stage of a child's life to exhaust, annoy, and occasionally, to delight.

Friday, May 13, 2011

Photos? Phooey! Bring on the videos!

"CBS News national security correspondent David Martin reports the 40 minutes it took to kill bin Laden and scoop his archives into garbage bags were all recorded by tiny helmet cameras worn by each of the 25 SEALs."
Via Brutally Honest

I guess we should keep on electing liberals!

Victor Davis Hanson weighs in on Bin Laden and postmodern thought: "Death ends legal issues, and in our postmodern, out-of-sight, out-of-mind world it is apparently as acceptable to act as judge, jury, and executioner of terrorist leaders (and rogue leaders like Qaddafi) as it is considered illegal and immoral to detain or water-board them."

More: "It’s also easier to conduct assassinations abroad if the Commander-in-Chief is liberal. This neutralizes criticism from the media, universities, the legal community, and Hollywood. Obama the law professor can assassinate bin Laden in Pakistan, dump his body in the ocean, and with first-person emphasis boast of our brilliant mission in a way Bush the Texan could not get away with—in the same manner that killing the son of Qaddafi, and the effort to kill Qaddafi himself, are not really forbidden targeted assassinations under Obama, and in the manner that Guantánamo, tribunals, renditions, preventive detentions, Predators, wiretaps, and intercepts that so bothered Senator Obama and others are now deemed essential. This paradox is just the way it is; the media will report a liberal president’s Predator drone attack or commando hit as done with reluctance and without other viable choices. Were a conservative leader to take the same actions, he would be portrayed as a trigger-happy war-monger reveling in the violence. Thus, the street celebrations that ensued when news of bin Laden’s death broke are seen by the media as a new unity inspired by Obama. Three years ago, they would have been seen as macabre triumphalism."

"Cosmic Law"

One Cosmos today featured this animated discussion of Socialism, which gave me a chuckle. I have been reading Mark Levin's book Liberty and Tyranny, which is excellent and has a good discussion of "Natural Law." Dr. Bob today makes many good points, as usual, but the one I liked best was his point that the term "Natural Law" is misleading, and should rather be called "Cosmic Law." To quote Bob:
"...Cosmic Law, i.e., those laws that are authorized and handed down by our Creator.

For only if there is a Creator can there be any universally applicable law. Otherwise we are ruled by custom, opinion and convenience, which in the end devolves to power, not truth.

Truth subordinated to power ends in Crucifixion. Conversely, power subordinated to Truth is Resurrection."


Thursday, May 12, 2011

One Dead Terrorist To Another - I Keel You!

The Modern Black Hole of Moral Clarity



    The news services around the world are reporting a verdict in the case of John Demjanjuk, a feeble 91-year old man now, once tried in Israeli court as being an infamous guard at the Treblinka death camp, but later found not to have been such.  He had been sentenced to death. Now, again he is before a judge and convicted, this time as being a Nazi collaborator serving as a prison guard at the behest of the Nazi SS. A card bearing some information that he was attached to the Sobibor prison camp in Nazi occupied Poland was the main piece of evidence against him. He is convicted and and sentenced to something like time served, five years prison.
     The truth of the atrocities done in the name of progress and the evolution of the human race during the time of Nazi Germany shocked a morally sleeping world into a new sense of the ability of men to be inhumane to other men. Movements have come and gone since then, trying to make right the wrongs of such pure evil, inconceivable to most of us. But... it was just such lack of moral clarity that led to the camps and prisons and "rehabilitation centers" like the Hadamar "clinic"  in Germany in WW II. The Americans came in and found these "camps" and "clinics" and found dead bodies stacked like cordwood and the evidence that the Germans even took the gold fillings from the teeth of the dead to sell for the future of the glorious Third Reich. This is clear and pure evil, no doubt.
    But... could it be that we have lost our way from moral clarity and left the path of clear thinking while still prosecuting those, guilty or not, from the last great attempt to deal with the evil of Man. We look back and hunt down old men for things done in the clutches of demonic evil, but still look at ourselves as somehow immune to the same influences today, while large parts of humanity suffer under the same kind of evils across the world, now under the name of Allah and Jihad. What's the difference between creating death camps for the purification and creation of the new super race and killing people in the name of the peace and prosperity of the great religion of peace, Islam? Hitler is gone, but men are still trying to imagine the perfect race of pure humanity. Usama bin Laden is dead, but men are still killing in the name of Allah. These things will continue to go on until we are willing to peer into the modern black hole of the lack of moral clarity that is in our own souls.  

Thursday, May 5, 2011

Don't worry: Islamic traditions were respected.

Frank J. Fleming assures us here on behalf of the U.S. Government that every effort was made to respect Islamic traditions in the care and treatment of Usama bin Laden's body.

What were they watching?

Now the CIA Director admits there was no live video feed when the attack was made on the bin Laden compound. Any ideas on what they may have been watching in the Situation Room?

What will it be like?

The Legend of Bagger Vance by Steven Pressfield is a book about a great golf match, but it it is also about a Christlike figure, Mr. Vance. The book makes one think about when Jesus comes back, or perhaps He has already come, and we don't see Him? Can we let go of our own egos long enough to realize His love for us and His presence? Can we surrender our wills to Him, trust Him, borrow His wisdom, strength and courage? Will we detest Him?

Monday, May 2, 2011

Doing the right thing

After reading my Alinsky post, reader Terri Wagner posed a question, and I gave an answer: "How do you since you had a first ring seat so to speak explain what Alinsky said. I mean his words at any rate speak different from what you are describing."

"Terri,
My understanding of him was, as I wrote, that he wanted real change. He saw the anti-poverty programs as nothing more than welfare programs that would keep the status quo. As a young social worker starting out, I saw things the same way. I wanted people to break free from dependence on these programs, do the things that would enable them to gain self respect and dignity, pride in accomplishments, and personal responsibility.

As time went on, I was personally turned off by his purposeful scapegoating of good people who happened to be in positions of power, such as Clarence Kelly, Kansas City's Chief of Police."

Likewise, I was turned off by Barack Obama's unfair scapegoating of President Bush. However, I am thankful that President Obama has had the wisdom to continue Bush's policies that resulted in the successful operation against Osama bin Laden. Unlike his promises to the left, Obama has kept open Guantanamo, and continued to interrogate the prisoners there. At times we can be thankful that Obama says one thing and does another!

True wisdom is revealed when we respect our opponents and do the right thing.

I Can Agree with These Atheists (Up to a Point) - Gary DeMar


I never thought I would ever say that I agree with atheists about the way some Christians interpret the Bible. But on the subject of Bible prophecy, these atheists are partially right. The group American Atheists is planning a “Rapture Party” on May 21–22 for “heathens and skeptics.” They’re advertising the event on a billboard. Here’s the message:
“The Rapture: You KNOW it’s Nonsense. 2000 Years of ‘Any Day Now.’ Learn the Truth at our Rapture Party, May 21–22.”
A lot of Christians will dismiss this stunt as just more atheist-mocking that only confirms that we are living in the last days because of what Peter writes in 2 Peter 3:3–4 (see article here [1]). The mocking of these first-century skeptics concerned Jesus’ prediction that He would return to destroy Jerusalem in fiery judgment (Matt. 22:7) before that first-century generation passed away (24:34). The prediction of an event that was said to be so “near” that it would come upon that generation and has not taken place after nearly 2000 years have passed deserves to be mocked.
The atheist billboard is in response to the claim that the end once again “is near,” so near that it’s all going to culminate in the “rapture” on May 21, 2011. So says Harold Camping, president of Family Radio and perennial date setter. He predicted a similar end in 1994. He was wrong then, and he’ll be wrong on May 22, and you don’t need to be a prophet to know this. It’s no accident that American Vision is holding its National Prophecy Conference [2] June 1–4.
These atheists do understand that prophetic speculation has a long history. Someone in every generation has predicted the end was near. Crying prophetic wolf has not helped the cause of Christ. These atheists do not understand the Bible’s very clear message on prophetic matters because they have been reading popular prophecy writers rather than the Bible. The only way to answer these skeptics is to take Jesus and the New Testament writers at their word. “Near,” “soon,” “shortly,” “at hand,” and “this generation” don’t mean “any moment” throughout 2000 years of history. “Near” means near, and “shortly” means shortly. Near and shortly for whom? It’s obvious to any first-time reader of the New Testament that near and shortly meant near and shortly for those who first read the gospels and epistles (e.g., James 5:7–9; Rev. 1:1, 3; 22:10). Jesus’ coming was near. He came in judgment against Jerusalem within a generation. The temple was destroyed, just like Jesus said it would be (Matt. 24:1–3).
It’s true that most of today’s prophecy writers do not make specific date-setting claims. But they all argue that Jesus’ coming is “near,” that all the signs are in place for the “soon rapture” of the church or the Second Coming. (They are not the same event in popular prophecy circles.) These types of books sell millions of copies. When the first Gulf War was waged, the late John F. Walvoord dusted off a book he wrote in 1974, Armageddon, Oil and the Middle East Crisis, revised it, and republished it in 1990. It sold nearly two million copies. He claimed, “Since the stage is set for this dramatic climax of the age, it must mean that Christ’s coming for his own is very near.”[1 [3]] That was 21 years ago. The book’s been revised by Walvoord’s son and Mark Hitchcock, and the new authors still maintain the end is near. The title has changed to fit the times. Now it’sArmageddon, Oil, and Terror. If this was a book about prophecy when it was first published in 1974, then why wasn’t it about terror then?
For nearly two centuries, prophecy writers have been predicting the near end based on certain prophetic passages. They all use the same passages! The only things that change are world events and newspaper headlines. We only have to go back to 1970 to Hal Lindsey’s The Late Great Planet Earth to see how popular date-setting has been.Readers were told that Israel becoming a nation again in 1948 was prophetically significant. The prophetic countdown began based on Lindsey’s claim that a “rapture” of the church would take place within 40 years (the length of a biblical generation) and the fulfillment of Jesus’ words in Matthew 24:34: “This generation will not pass away until all these things take place.” The Late Great Planet Earth has sold around 35 million copies. We are more than 23 years past the 1988 cut-off date set by Lindsey and other prophecy writers.
Chuck Smith, founder of Calvary Chapel, made a similar prediction. “That generation that was living in May 1948 shall not pass away until the second coming of Jesus Christ takes place and the kingdom of God established upon the earth. How long is a generation? Forty years on average in the Bible. . . . Where does that put us? It puts us right out at the end. We’re coming down to the wire.”[2 [4]] On December 31, 1979, Smith told those who had gathered at Calvary Chapel that the rapture would take place before the end of 1981 based on the fact that Israel had become a nation again in 1948, and a generation of 40 years would not pass away before the “rapture” took place. He went on to say that because of ozone depletion Revelation 16:8 would be fulfilled during the tribulation period: “And the fourth angel poured out his bowl upon the sun; and it was given to it to scorch men with fire.”
Smith stated that Halley’s Comet would pass near earth in 1986 and would wreak havoc on those left behind as debris from its million-mile-long tail pummeled the planet.[3[5]] Here’s how Smith explained the prophetic scenario in his book Future Survival which is nearly identical to what appears on the taped message: “The Lord said that towards the end of the Tribulation period the sun would scorch men who dwell upon the face of the earth (Rev. 16). The year 1986 would fit just about right! We’re getting close to the Tribulation and the return of Christ in glory. All the pieces of the puzzle are coming together.”[4 [6]]
Anyone familiar with the history of prophetic speculation since 1970 knows all of this. The atheists certainly know it. Harold Camping is an extreme example of date setting, but his methodology is no more excessive than that of Lindsey, LaHaye, Smith, and dozens of others. They all take words like “near” and “shortly” and project them into the distant future when contextually the prophecies were given to describe events that were on the near horizon for the Bible’s first readers. An article on the Christian Post [7]website gets it right when it states, “Still, many evangelical Christians don’t deny that the last days are near.” That word “near” is very important. At the top of one of Harold Camping’s billboards you’ll find the words, “THE LORD’S RETURN IS NEAR.” How many times have you heard prophecy teachers say the same thing? “Jesus is coming soon. . . . The rapture is near. . . . Clearly these are signs of the times.”
These atheists aren’t the first to notice the problem with these types of predictions since the use of “near” is found in the New Testament. Anti-theist Christopher Hitchens, in his debate with Christian minister Douglas Wilson titled Collision [8], raised the issue, claiming Jesus was wrong when He said “this generation will not pass away until all these things take place.”[5 [9]] Wilson easily rebutted Hitchens’ charge by stating that Jesus was not wrong since He was predicting His coming in judgment against Jerusalem, an event that took place in A.D. 70. In his most recent book Divinity of Doubt [10] Vincent Bugliosi centers on the Bible’s claim that Jesus is coming “soon.” “How soon did Jesus mean?,” Bugliosi asks. “Very soon.”[6 [11]] But that was nearly 2000 years ago! There is no answer to Bugliosi’s argument unless you take the Bible at its word. This particular New Testament coming is neither a “rapture” nor the Second Coming. It’s a judgment coming. It was near for to whom the gospels and epistles were written.
Bart Ehrman, once an evangelical Christians and now a constant critic of anything Christian and biblical, began to question the authority of the Bible over the issue of prophecy. His best-selling book Misquoting Jesus begins by describing how he struggled to reconcile what he believed to be errors in the Bible.[7 [12]] His pilgrimage from Moody Bible Institute to Princeton changed him forever. His skeptical trek down the road of skepticism begins with what he describes as “one of the most popular books on campus” at the time, Hal “Lindsay’s [sic] apocalyptic blueprint for our future, The Late Great Planet Earth.” Ehrman’s story is not unusual.
The well-known atheist Bertrand Russell seized on what he perceived to be untrustworthy testimony by Jesus and concluded that the Bible was not what theologians and the Bible itself claims to be. He wrote the following in Why I Am Not a Christian:
I am concerned with Christ as he appears in the Gospel narrative as it stands, and there one does find some things that do not seem to be very wise. For one thing, He certainly thought that His second coming would occur in clouds of glory before the death of all the people who were living at that time. There are a great many texts that prove that and there are a lot of places where it is quite clear that He believed that His coming would happen during the lifetime of many then living. That was the belief of His earlier followers, and it was the basis of a good deal of His moral teaching.[8 [13]]
Writing for the Skeptical Inquirer, Gerald A. Larue takes a position similar to that of Russell, Hitchens, Bugliosi, and Ehrman concluding that the Bible cannot be trusted because Jesus was wrong about the timing of His coming:
Although apocalyptic mythology is found throughout the New Testament and is portrayed in its most organized form in Revelation, the gospel writers gave authority for the idea to John the Baptizer, who introduced the theme in the gospels, and to Jesus, who explained signs of the end of the age and promised his disciples that the new kingdom of God would be ushered in during their lifetime (Matt. 16:28). Jesus was wrong. Indeed, during the second century CE, some Christians asked, “Where is the promise of His coming? For ever since the fathers fell asleep, all things have continued as they were from the beginning of creation.” (2 Peter 3:4). All we can say is that from that time on, every prophetic pronouncement of the ending of time has been wrong.[9 [14]]
If Jesus was wrong, then critics like Russell and Larue can rightly conclude that we cannot trust anything He said. In addition, if Jesus, being the Son of God, was wrong, then how can we trust the writers of the New Testament, who claimed to be nothing more than finite and fallible sinners?
Evangelicals have done a poor job in reconciling these time texts with other parts of the Bible and with the history of the time. Their argument goes something like this: “Itseems that Jesus was predicting that He would return before the last disciple died (Matt. 16:27–28; John 21:18–25), but He didn’t really mean to leave that impression.” This is hardly a convincing argument, and it has led to the shipwreck of the faith of many former believers who can follow a logical argument from Scripture and get less than compelling arguments from prophecy writers.
The atheists have a legitimate charge against modern-day prophecy writers, but they don’t have a charge against the Bible. Jesus and the rest of the New Testament predicted that He would return in judgment within a generation, and He did. The New Testament writers clearly state that the time was near for this event. There is no other way to read the New Testament. So let’s stop giving atheists ammunition.
For a detailed response to this particular issue and related prophetic topics see the following books and DVD series by Gary DeMar, all available at www.AmericanVision.com [15]


Endnotes:
  1. John W. Walvoord, Armageddon, Oil and the Middle East Crisis (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1990), 228. Walvoord claims that “Christ’s coming for his own is very near.” The New Testament, written nearly 2000 years ago, said that Christ’s coming was “near” (James 5:8–9; Rev. 1:3). In his September 16, 2001, International Intelligence Briefing Report, aired on the Trinity Broadcasting Network, Hal Lindsey told viewers: “Tuesday, September 11, 2001, the end began. . . . The events, even of this week, show us that we’re very near the end. The whole predicted scenario is fulfilled right before our eyes. All the pieces of that predicted puzzle that would indicate Christ’s coming was just around the corner are in place. . . . I believe that, right now, we need to focus on the great hope that we have that Jesus Christ is sooncoming and [is] going to translate [rapture] us from mortal to immortal.” This is the same Hal Lindsey who assured his readers in the 1970 publication of Late Great Planet Earth that Jesus would rapture His church before 1988. He’s the same “prophecy expert” who claimed in his book The 1980’s: Countdown to Armageddon that “The decade of the 1980’s could very well be the last decade of history as we know it.” You would think that these errors in predicting the end would have been enough for Christians to rethink the basic tenets of dispensationalism or at least reject the false predictions of people like Lindsey. [ [22]]
  2. Chuck Smith, Snatched Away (Costa Mesa, CA: Maranatha Evangelical Association of Calvary Chapel, 1976), 21. [ [23]]
  3. Halley’s Comet also appeared in A.D. 66 and passed over Jerusalem, four years before the destruction of the temple in Jerusalem by the Romans. Could this have been the fulfillment of Luke 21:11? [ [24]]
  4. Chuck Smith, Future Survival (Costa Mesa, CA: The Word for Today, [1978] 1980), 21. [ [25]]
  5. You can see the exchange in the film Collision [8] (2009). [ [26]]
  6. Divinity of Doubt: The God Question ((Vincent Bugliosi, Divinity of Doubt: The God Question (New York: Vanguard Press, 2010), 302, note 9. [ [27]]
  7. Bart D. Ehrman, Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why (New York: HarperCollins, 2005). [ [28]]
  8. Bertrand Russell, Why I Am Not a Christian (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1957), 16. [ [29]]
  9. Gerald A. Larue, “The Bible and the Prophets of Doom,” Skeptical Inquirer (January/February 1999), 29. [ [30]]

How U.S. Forces Took Out World's Top Terror Boss

WASHINGTON –  Helicopters descended out of darkness on the most important counterterrorism mission in U.S. history. It was an operation so secret, only a select few U.S. officials knew what was about to happen.
The location was a fortified compound in an affluent Pakistani town two hours outside Islamabad. The target was Usama bin Laden.
Intelligence officials discovered the compound in August while monitoring an Al Qaeda courier. The CIA had been hunting that courier for years, ever since detainees told interrogators that the courier was so trusted by bin Laden that he might very well be living with the Al Qaeda leader.
Nestled in an affluent neighborhood, the compound was surrounded by walls as high as 18 feet, topped with barbed wire. Two security gates guarded the only way in. A third-floor terrace was shielded by a seven-foot privacy wall. No phone lines or Internet cables ran to the property. The residents burned their garbage rather than put it out for collection. Intelligence officials believed the million-dollar compound was built five years ago to protect a major terrorist figure. The question was, who?
The CIA asked itself again and again who might be living behind those walls. Each time, they concluded it was almost certainly bin Laden.
President Barack Obama described the operation in broad strokes Sunday night. Details were provided in interviews with counterterrorism and intelligence authorities, senior administration officials and other U.S. officials. All spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive operation.
By mid-February, intelligence from multiple sources was clear enough that Obama wanted to "pursue an aggressive course of action," a senior administration official said. Over the next two and a half months, Obama led five meetings of the National Security Council focused solely on whether bin Laden was in that compound and, if so, how to get him, the official said.
Normally, the U.S. shares its counterterrorism intelligence widely with trusted allies in Britain, Canada, Australia and elsewhere. And the U.S. normally does not carry out ground operations inside Pakistan without collaboration with Pakistani intelligence. But this mission was too important and too secretive.
On April 29, Obama approved an operation to kill bin Laden. It was a mission that required surgical accuracy, even more precision than could be delivered by the government's sophisticated Predator drones. To execute it, Obama tapped a small contingent of the Navy's elite SEAL Team Six and put them under the command of CIA Director Leon Panetta, whose analysts monitored the compound from afar.
Panetta was directly in charge of the team, a U.S. official said, and his conference room was transformed into a command center.
Details of exactly how the raid unfolded remain murky. But the Al Qaeda courier, his brother and one of bin Laden's sons were killed. No Americans were injured. Senior administration officials will only say that bin Laden "resisted." And then the man behind the worst terrorist attack on U.S. soil died from an American bullet to his head.
It was mid-afternoon in Virginia when Panetta and his team received word that bin Laden was dead. Cheers and applause broke out across the conference room.
Associated Press writers Kimberly Dozier, Adam Goldman and Julie Pace in Washington contributed to this report; Kathy Gannon contributed from Islamabad.